Honduras is the second poorest
country in the world, where 66.2% of its people live in poverty (Ceciskids).
Coupled with the worst gang epidemic on the planet, Honduras experiences an
extreme level of intrastate violence. This high level of national failure has
resulted from the nation’s lack of effective government regulation, stable
economy, or sustainable environmental practices. Environmentalists have
especially criticized the last point, Honduras’s environmental practices, which
they have linked to the region’s high level of violence. In particular, the
expansion of Honduras’s industrial shrimp farming, which is their third highest
source of foreign exchange, has resulted in an increase in conflict. Industrial
shrimp farming, which poses an imminent threat to the region, should be
considered an issue of national security.
Numerous organizations have dedicated themselves
to improving conditions in Honduras. I have developed a personal stake in this
goal by joining one of these organizations, Students Helping Honduras, which
sends thousands of volunteers to build schools in Honduras annually. This
winter, I will be traveling to Honduras with Students Helping Honduras to
assist in building a middle school in the village of La Democracia. Although
the mission of Students Helping Honduras does not directly relate to the
environment, it supports the overall goal of repairing the nation. However,
this goal cannot be accomplished without considering the environment. The
numerous problems suffered by Honduras work like an interconnected web in that
they all affect one another and therefore must all be resolved together.
Insuring that all of the children living in Honduras are given the opportunity
to have successful futures cannot be accomplished by only providing them with
schools and education. Education is a promising step, which Students Helping
Honduras successfully provides; however, more changes in the country need to be
accomplished on a wider scale in order to repair the nation. I recognize that
significant strides must be made in the nation’s economy and its society, which
are both highly related to the environment. Shrimp farming depicts the
relationship between these three sectors of the economy, environment, and
society, and illustrates how problems in one area spread to the others,
resulting in overall turbulence for the control.
Shrimp farming, which is highly related to the
environment, is essential to the economy of Honduras and also affects the level
of conflict in society. In Stonich and Vandergeest’s chapter, “Violence,
Environment, and Industrial Shrimp Farming,” they describe how violent
confrontations have arisen as a result of shrimp farming. They accentuate the
linkage between violence and the environment, resulting from the development of
industrial shrimp farming.
Stonich and Vandergeest emphasize that Southern
Honduras is a “critically endangered region,” according the United Nations.
Shrimp farming in Honduras occurs along the Gulf of Fonseca, which is one of
the poorest and environmentally damaged areas in the nation. This body of water
serves as an essential ecosystem, but is very vulnerable to pollution and
siltation. Shrimp farming has caused several negative consequences on the
environment including the degradation of agricultural land and surface water.
Simultaneously, many negative social consequences have occurred as a result of
shrimp farming, such as social dislocation, conflict over property rights, and
displacement of local farmers and fishermen. Prior to Honduras’ shrimp boom,
natives were allowed access to the wetlands to acquire resources themselves.
However, when shrimp farming’s proliferated and shrimp farming interest
obtained control over the region, these locals’ access became limited. As a
result of limited access and these social consequences, conflict has ensued
between shrimp farming interests on one side and local farmers, natives, and
environmentalists on the other end. Most of the conflict occurs between
well-organized peasant organizations and large shrimping enterprises. The
latter has shown resistance to shrimp farming through noncompliance, protest
marches, and violent opposition, such as destroying canals and burning
buildings.
As a result of environmental and social harm
caused by shrimp farming, the industry experiences economic harm. Although
shrimp is a major export for Honduras, the lack of sustainability in the
industry from exploitation and environmental damage is risking its longevity.
Similarly, the high level of conflict in the region that has regulated from the
government’s lack of regulation over the resource of shrimp has also endangered
the future of the industry. Creating stable social, economic, and environmental
structures simultaneously is necessary in order to alleviate the severe
problems existing in Honduras. Therefore, environmental issues, such as the
regulation of shrimp farming, should be considered an issue of national
security. In order for a county to succeed and for their conflict to be
reduced, their environment must be protected.
Additional
Source: http://ceciskids.org/our-story/
Mandi,
ReplyDeleteI strongly agree with your argument that the degradation of the environment in Honduras needs to be perceived as a threat to the state's national security. However, as the shrimping industry is one of both the primary economic sectors and leading cause of environmental deterioration, how do we approach this issue without destroying the economic interests of the people of Honduras or their ecosystem? I think that one plausible solution which you have a direct hand in is education; through programs such as Students Helping Honduras (SHH), you are directly providing the next generation of Honduras with the opportunity for increased awareness of the salience of the environment and economic well-being. Educating this future generation on ways to preserve the environment while diversifying the economy - by branching out into the capitalization of other resources - is fundamental to the ability of Honduras to continue and survive. However, do you think that simply educating the next generation is enough? Or do international regimes need to step in and put a direct halt to shrimping by use of force or embargoes?