In discussing forest
violence in class, we honed in on three specific cases of violence in Sudan,
Brazil, and Sierra Leone. As we know, these countries make up only a sampling
of those suffering from violence that stems from their possession of rare and
valuable timber. One aspect of this that we briefly touched on during lecture
is the role of foreign or outside demand for these rare resources on prospects
for violence within a state, or a region in general. Particularly, I believe
that it is extremely important to acknowledge and discuss the direct role that
outside demand for various abundant resources plays in causing specific
regional conflict. China’s relentless demand for Siamese rosewood in the Mekong
provides an excellent example of the detrimental power that foreign demand for
a resource can have in fueling violence in a region. This case also shows why
countries, like China, must be held accountable for their role in instigating
conflict, as well as their involvement in illegally obtaining and importing
such resources.
In recent years,
environmentalists have seen consistent surges in demand for Siamese rosewood, a
unique and extremely valuable, luxury wood native to states in the Mekong
region of Southeast Asia (Phys). According to a comprehensive report from the
Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), illegal logging and immense
corruption has contributed to the vast depletion, and near extinction, of the
Siamese rosewood species, local to Thailand, Burma (Myanmar), Cambodia, Laos,
and Vietnam (NY Times). The Chinese elite play the largest role in the demand
for this depleting resource because of their lust for “reproductions of ornate
high-end furniture from the Ming and Qing eras”, made specifically from
precious “hongmu” or old redwood trees (Global Post). According to estimates,
since the year 2000, China has imported an estimated $2.4 billion dollars worth
of timber from the Mekong region, the vast majority of which is obtained
through illegal logging efforts. To begin to understand how heavily China
relies on countries in this region for this abundant, but now grossly depleting
resource, it is necessary to note that in 2013 alone, Myanmar exported 273,000
cubic meters of rosewood to China, which was triple the volume exported in
previous years. The EIA reports that this amounts to “one-thirteenth of the
estimated rosewood stock in the [country]”, and with current logging rates,
Myanmar’s forests will be completely stripped of the timber in just thirteen
years (Eco-Business).
With China’s
relentless demand for this rosewood, and the ability of this species to rake in
“thousands of dollars per cubic meter”, local individuals attempt to take
advantage of this and cash in on this lucrative, Chinese-driven market (Global
Post). This has initiated a wave of physical violence throughout countries in
the region as loggers clash with park rangers in their efforts to illegally
harvest the rosewood. In the thick brush on the borders of Thailand and
Cambodia, loggers often clash with Thai security forces, often leading to
deaths and disappearances among loggers and locals seeking to make a quick
return (Global Post). The EIA reports that in 2009, dozens of Thai forest
rangers were killed and further, there has been consistent blaming between the
Thai and Cambodian governments about local clashes that have led to the deaths
of villagers seeking to cross borders to illegally harvest the rosewood (Global
Post).
Because of increased
local awareness of this loosely regulated industry, many locals have taken it
upon themselves to cross borders and attempt to illegally harvest, thus
initiating various small scale, but bloody skirmishes. This illegal industry
essentially aids in exploiting the already poor economic situations of these
rural villagers, because these rosewood buyers offer small sums of money (USD
$25-$200 per excursion) to the local people to partake in this illegal
harvesting, and unfortunately, this presents itself as the source of income for
some (UCA News). Interestingly enough, buyers and middlemen who recruit from
local villagers pay the illegal loggers in methamphetamines, which arguably,
exploits and promotes other social issues in the region, and can keep
individuals dependent on illegal logging for their drug habits (NY Times).
Although ample
responsibility must rest on the nations with rich natural resources, foreign
nations that demand and acquire such resources through illegal means must, too,
be held accountable for their illegal activities and role in instigating
regional conflict.
With the case of the
Siamese rosewood, China, the largest importer of this timber, must be held
accountable for its actions in continuing to import this rapidly dwindling
resource. I would agree with the EIA’s assessment that China needs to take
greater steps to curb the influx of illegal timber into its region, with the
hopes that the nation can eventually be incentivized to ban imports of the
rosewood altogether. If countries like China take responsibility for their
actions, or are forced to take responsibility from international pressures, arguably
much of the violence and exploitative nature of illegal logging can be mitigated
because there will no longer be a market that drives individuals to commit
illegal logging and kill for personal gain. Further, nations of the Mekong
region will have the opportunity to recover from the economic loss stolen from
them in the process of illegal logging. As demonstrated by China’s clear role in
demanding and harvesting luxury woods in the Mekong region, it is necessary to
devote ample attention to how this foreign influence instigates conflict in
resource rich areas.
Sources:
http://phys.org/news/2014-05-china-demand-luxury-furniture-decimating.html
http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/05/13/chinas-demand-threatens-rare-hardwoods-in-mekong/?_r=0
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/140512/china-demand-luxury-furniture-decimating-rosewood
http://www.eco-business.com/opinion/surging-chinese-demand-rosewood-ruining-forests-across-southern-asia/
http://www.ucanews.com/news/demand-for-rare-wood-puts-cambodians-in-line-of-fire/70954
I enjoyed reading this case study and finding the similarities between those we discussed in class. I fully agree with you that the powers that demand and continue to import these goods, in this case illegally logged rosewood, should be held at least partly accountable for the violence and conflict caused over the resource. How might you suggest regulating and minimizing this type of relationship between states?
ReplyDeleteJess,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the feedback! This is a really tough case in terms of finding solutions, because I think that a significant portion of the blame must be placed on China for continuing to illegally log and then import the rosewood. At the same time, it is proving very difficult to actually hold them accountable for this, and get them to place higher restrictions on the import of the rosewood. In terms of regulating, I would reiterate that China must take larger steps to control the illegal import of the rosewood, and I think that some sort of incentive would be one of the only ways to get them to turn away from this lucrative, but illegal business. I think if we can do this, than much of the cross border violence can be diminished.